Ask Questions, Discuss Approaches & No Clutter

American executives, unlike their japanese

Open 1 Answers 59 Views
GMAT Timer00:00
Official Answer

1 Answer


B) are under pressure to show 
Here's how I thought through this one... 
1. What's the split? "are/pressure" vs. "have pressure" 
2. Which split can I eliminate? 
> Okay, you have pressure on something, not "to" or "that" 
> Eliminate "have pressure" split, i.e., Eliminate A and E! 
3. Out of B,C and D, which two can I definitely eliminate? 
> "are pressured toward showing" -- ambiguous. Are they pressured or not? This seems to change the meaning of the sentence. Eliminate D! 
> "are under the pressure of..." Hmm, are the Am. execs under a Rock?? As arashyazdiha pointed out, the way this is worded, you expect the "subject" of the sentence to come right after "of". 
>> For example, Am. execs ... are are under the pressure of "the sarbanes-oxley" law. 
> Okay, Eliminate C 
4. Answer, by POE, is (B) 
> B is a valid idiom too! "under pressure to.." 

answered May 16, 2016 by Guru (5,628 points)
Student Speaks

Jyotsna Mehta

Indian School of Business, Co'18

I am very thankful to Gmatxchange and would definitely recommend Gmatxchange mentors to all those students applying for MBA admissions

Your Tentative GMAT Score
Estimate your GMAT score.
The scorer helps you to determine your current level within a few questions you solve.Read More
Please log in or register to use the Scoring Feature
Confused about your profile & colleges, Get FREE profile evaluation today from over 10 consultants.
Follow us and get quick prep updates on Facebook