Ask Questions, Discuss Approaches & No Clutter
0

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the

Open 4 Answers 53 Views Sentence Correction
GMAT Timer00:00

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.
(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved
(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolving
(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolving
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved

4 Answers

GMATwithCJ
0
Top Pick from GMAT with CJ

Solution

Sentence Analysis

The sentence says that Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests something. What does it suggest? Let?s focus on this part:

  • that suggests
    • that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal,
    • and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel

The evidence suggests two things:

  1. The elephant is a descendant of an aquatic animal
  2. The trunk of the elephant originally evolved as a kind of snorkel (or if you don?t know the meaning of snorkel, you can think it as "kind of something")

There are two clear problems with this sentence ? both in latter part of "and":

  1. "its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel" doesn?t have a verb. The "trunk" is followed by a verb-ing modifier. Logically, the idea communicated in this part seems to be suggested by the evidence. Therefore, it needs to be parallel to the clause before "and". In other words, we need to change "evolving" (a modifier) to a verb in this part to make it correct.
  2. The other problem is that we need to repeat "that" after "and" to make it parallel to "that the elephant is _". Please remember that we cannot take "that" as common to the two clauses. Why do we need to repeat it? Because without such repetition, one can possibly understand the part after "and" to be another independent clause and not something suggested by the evidence.

There?s another problem that is not-so-major and about the quality aspect of the sentence. It doesn?t seem very polished to write two thats one after the other - "that suggests that". One way to change the same is by writing "suggesting that".

(Please note that "is descended" is absolutely correct, no matter how wrong it may sound to you. This construction is same as "This plant is grown from hybrid seeds". "Grown" and "descended" are both past participle forms of the corresponding verbs. Saying "the elephant has descended" would mean that the elephant has done the action of descending.)

(Another point to note here is that "suggest" is one of the bossy verbs requiring a subjunctive verb after them e.g. I suggest that he be called. However, there?s another use of "suggest", in which it means "indicates". This is the way "suggest" is used in this sentence.)

Option Analysis

(A) Incorrect . For the errors pointed above.

(B) Incorrect . For the following reasons:

  1. "evidence has suggested" means that the evidence has completed the action of "suggesting" in the recent past. However, logically, we know that such an action has not been completed and that the evidence still suggests whatever it suggests. So, the use of present perfect is incorrect in this context.
  2. "the elephant descended" means that the elephant did the action of "descending". Clearly, it doesn?t make sense to say so. The elephant is the result of this "descending", so it cannot possibly do the action. (Some people may also notice the absence of "that" after ?suggested?. However, this is not an error. There are situations in which we can omit ?that?. For example: "He confirmed that he did not go to the graveyard" is perfectly fine.)
  3. "its trunk originally evolving" is now playing the role of a "Noun + Noun modifier", correctly punctuated with a comma. However, using this modifier distorts the meaning; now, it doesn?t seem that the evidence suggests that the trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.

(C) Incorrect . For the following reasons:

  1. "had descended" is incorrect for two reasons. First, it indicates that the elephant performed the action of "descending". Second, the use of past perfect is incorrect. There is no event in the simple past with which this event is sequenced.
  2. "with its trunk originally evolved" introduces two more errors. First, the preposition ?with? is followed by a clause (trunk: subject, evolved: verb). A preposition must always be followed by a noun phrase and never be followed by a clause. Second, this construction distorts the meaning; now, it doesn?t seem that the evidence suggests so.

(D) Incorrect . For the following reasons:

  1. "had descended" is wrong for the reasons explained above.
  2. "that" is missing after ?and?.

(E) Correct . This option corrects all the errors in the original sentence without bringing in any new errors. "evidence to suggest" is correct and means the almost the same as "evidence that suggests". The subtle difference is that in the latter case, the evidence is suggesting something but in the former case, the evidence is just leading to the suggestion, not doing the "suggesting" itself. The difference is subtle and not relevant to the question.

answered Jun 5 by Beginner (1 point)
gmatclubforum
0
Top Pick from GMAT Club Forum

Concept tested: Parallelism, meaning, usage, style.
Difficulty: High
Illustration: "is descended" and "has/had descended" mean two entirely different things. Has/had descended implies going below (literally or metaphorically).
e.g: I had descended a few steps in the cave.
e.g: I would never want to descend to his level of callousness.
Is descended from implies ancestry. So obviously has/had descended is incorrect.
So, B,C,D are eliminated.
However between A and E, E is marginally better because of two things:
1. That suggests that in A sounds horrible.
2. E maintains "that" parallelism. (however the "second that" in A which apparently seems to be missing is not absolutely essential.)
E is the correct answer

answered Jun 5 by Beginner (21 points)
gmatclubforum
0
Top Pick from GMAT Club Forum

evidence should be followed by that here since whatever clause is succeding this gives explanation about what evidence consists of.
hence C,D,E incorrectly point to embryologists instead of evidence.
eliminate C D E
now b/w among A and B ,its trunk evolving is incorrect ,it evolved is correct usage.evolved just once and thts not a continuos process.
A is the answer
Lets see this :
Why is " elephant is descended" grammatically correct.
this is correct always .
usage of suggest
?verb (used with object)
1. to mention or introduce (an idea, proposition, plan, etc.) for consideration or possible action: The architect suggested that the building be restored.
2. to propose (a person or thing) as suitable or possible for some purpose: We suggested him for president.
3. (of things) to prompt the consideration, making, doing, etc., of: The glove suggests that she was at the scene of the crime .
4. to bring before a person's mind indirectly or without plain expression: I didn't tell him to leave, I only suggested it.
5. to call (something) up in the mind through association or natural connection of ideas: The music suggests a still night.
Other examples :
Jerry suggested that tom is back
jerry suggested that the movie is over
I hope i cleared the doubt to some extent.
answered Jun 5 by Beginner (21 points)
gmatclubforum
0
Top Pick from GMAT Club Forum

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.
A. that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved
B. that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving -> Descended -> Coming down -> Wrong
C. suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolving -> no point to use Past perfect
D. to suggest that the elephant has descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved -> The action of descending is still continuing.
E. to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved
A. that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved
For A)
Australian embryologists have found evidence that
Suggests that
the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal
, and
its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.
Now I am confused where does "its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel." sentence connects to?
Does it connect to
Australian embryologists have found evidence that its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel. -> Complete Non sense
or
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that its (elephants) trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel -> This make sense.
Whereas Option E) is correct and there is no confusion.

answered Jun 5 by Beginner (21 points)
Student Speaks

Jyotsna Mehta

Indian School of Business, Co'18

I am very thankful to Gmatxchange and would definitely recommend Gmatxchange mentors to all those students applying for MBA admissions

Your Tentative GMAT Score
Estimate your GMAT score.
700
The scorer helps you to determine your current level within a few questions you solve.Read More
Please log in or register to use the Scoring Feature
Confused about your profile & colleges, Get FREE profile evaluation today from over 10 consultants.
Follow us and get quick prep updates on Facebook
...