0

# From an experiment using special extrasensory perception cards each

Open 2 Answers 110 Views Sentence Correction
GMAT Timer00:00

From an experiment using special extrasensory perception cards, each bearing one of a set of symbols, parapsychologist Joshep Banks Rhine claimed statistical proof for subjects who could use thought transference to identify a card in the dealer's hand .
A. for subjects who could use thought transference to identify a card in the dealer's hand
B. for a card in the dealer's hand to be identified by subjects with thought transference
C. of subjects able to identify with thought transference a card in the dealer's hand
D. that subjects could identify a card in the dealer's hand by using thought transference
E. that subjects are capable to use thought transference for identifying a card in the dealer's hand

0
Top Pick from GMAT with CJ

# Solution

### Sentence Analysis

• From an experiment (Prepositional phrase modifying the main verb "claimed")
• using special extrasensory perception cards, (verb-ing modifier modifying "experiment")
• each bearing one of a set of symbols, (Noun + Noun modifier modifying "cards")
• parapsychologist Joseph Banks Rhine claimed statistical proof for subjects (Main clause. Subject ? "Joseph Banks Rhine"; Verb ? "claimed")
• who could use thought transference to identify a card in the dealer's hand . (relative clause modifying "subjects")

The sentence talks about a claim that JBR made from an experiment. He claimed statistical proof that people could use thought transference to identify a card in the dealer?s hand.

The problem with the sentence is that with the given structure, the sentence doesn?t communicate this meaning clearly. As is, the sentence says that JBR claimed statistical proof for subjects. The sentence then provides additional information about these subjects. If it were "statistical proof for the existence of subjects", it might still make sense, but "statistical proof for subjects" doesn?t make a lot of sense. Besides, the given idea is communicated much more clearly in the form of a clause, as in option D.

For example: which of the following sentences seems better to you?

1. I have found a proof for people who can master SC.
2. I have found a proof that people can master SC.

The second one. Right?

### Option Analysis

(A) Incorrect . For the reason mentioned above.

(B) Incorrect . "statistical proof for a card" doesn?t make a lot of sense in the given context.

(C) Incorrect . Has the same problem as option A. Also, even if we have to use this twisted structure, we need to have verb-ing after ?subjects? i.e. "subjects being able to_".

(D) Correct . This option communicates the meaning clearly.

(E) Incorrect . For the following reasons:

1. "capable to use" is non-idiomatic. The correct idiomatic structure is "capable of verb-ing" i.e. "capable of using" in this case. (For ?able?, the correct idiomatic structure is "able to verb")
2. Since "identifying a card" is the purpose of using thought transference, the idea is better communicated using the purpose word ?to? i.e. "to identify a card".
answered Jun 10, 2017 by Beginner (1 point)
0
Top Pick from GMAT Club Forum

A. for subjects who could use thought transference to identify a card in the dealer's hand --- He didn?t claim proof for subject s
B. for a card in the dealer's hand to be identified by subjects with thought transference -- -He didn?t claim proof for a card
C. of subjects able to identify with thought transference a card in the dealer's hand -- He didn?t claim proof of subjects
D. that subjects could identify a card in the dealer's hand by using thought transference --- When a claim is reported a relative clause using' that' is required correct choice
E. that subjects are capable to use thought transference for identifying a card in the dealer's hand?unconcise--- capable to use is unidiomatic. Could identify is more forthwith

answered Jun 10, 2017 by Beginner (21 points)
Student Speaks

Jyotsna Mehta