PA groups have started using IT to disseminate info on politics for public, bypassing tradional news sources,(Which were selective). Hence IT services present a BALANCED (this is the mainstay of the conclusion) picture of policial complexities than any other traditonal news source
Prethink assumptions: 1) By using IT services, PA groups are ensuring no selectiveness will be there. 2) there is no other source of obtaining news info other than traditional news sources.
(A) We are not concerned about large scale accessibility of news, but are concerned about how BALANCED (by virtue if being non selective, non biased) the news is. Leave this
(B) Diff news sources (each with some bias) present info, from which people will develop an understanding. This is a WEAKENER, as the news sources are already biased
(C) Sounds okay. Says that the argumwnt believes that news on it services will not come entirely from a single aource which may be biased. Keep this in
Check: (C) Negation: News info on IT services will come entirely from a single source which is biased. This weakens the argument whcich says that IT services present a balances view of political news.
Hence (C) is correct.