Ask Questions, Discuss Approaches & No Clutter
0

If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one

Open 1 Answers 20 Views
If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one less vehicle emitting pollution into the air than there would be otherwise. Therefore if people would walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so, then pollution will be greatly reduced.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A) Cutting down on pollution can be achieved in a variety of ways.
B) Taking public transportation rather than driving is not always feasible.
C) Walking is the only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution.
D) There are people who never drive but who often walk.
E) People sometimes drive when it is feasible to walk instead.

1 Answer

stejokrishna
0
E- because If we negate E our Conclusion will be shattered.
People already walk whenever it's feasible to walk. If this will be a scenario then there is no benefit from the shift from driving to walking.
answered Jul 26, 2016 by Beginner (1 point)
Student Speaks

Jyotsna Mehta

Indian School of Business, Co'18

I am very thankful to Gmatxchange and would definitely recommend Gmatxchange mentors to all those students applying for MBA admissions

Your Tentative GMAT Score
Estimate your GMAT score.
700
The scorer helps you to determine your current level within a few questions you solve.Read More
Please log in or register to use the Scoring Feature
Confused about your profile & colleges, Get FREE profile evaluation today from over 10 consultants.
Follow us and get quick prep updates on Facebook
...